One thing that I feel is underappreciated about 90s Yes is their prolific creation and release of new studio albums even though they were past the era where their music could be expected to top the charts. They managed 5 albums in 10 years- not bad at all quantity wise. I'd be estatic if the band ever returned to that level of output.
Quality wise, I think this era falls beneath the peak decades of the 70s and 80s, but that's to be expected. Almost every band that was popular in the 70s and 80s saw a little bit of a dropoff in the 90s if they were still together. The question is: Was the music still good in general terms even if it couldn't match the almost impossibly high standards of decades past? I feel the answer is Yes. Did it still sound like the band that recorded those earlier albums? I would say Yes to that, too, the essential elements, quantifiable and unquantifiable that make something Yes were there.
There are plenty of good songs to found in that decade's output.
I would even say my two favorite 90s albums are better than my two least favorite 70s albums.
This is my ranking of the 90s albums:
1. Union
2. Talk
3. The Ladder
4. Open Your Eyes
5. Keys to Ascension
Over time, the main change I notice is that The Ladder climbed one spot in my evaluation. In the first few years I had it, it seemed a little cheesy, but eventually more and more songs jumped out to me as being of high quality and I began to rethink that, climbing to the percise middle of the Yes 90s pack.
While Open Your Eyes might not make a top five or top 10 list of my favorite Billy Sherwood albums (i.e. A lot of his non-Yes work is better), I still think it was a pretty creative attempt to reimagine Yes for a new era and that the level of criticism it gets seems uncalled for.
Where maybe my views differ the most from others is that Keys to Ascension might be my least favorite of Yes' 21 albums. Still, "Children of Light" is pretty catchy when it comes up on shuffle. Even the worst Yes album still manages to have some highlights, at least when one isn't listening to them very often.
Quality wise, I think this era falls beneath the peak decades of the 70s and 80s, but that's to be expected. Almost every band that was popular in the 70s and 80s saw a little bit of a dropoff in the 90s if they were still together. The question is: Was the music still good in general terms even if it couldn't match the almost impossibly high standards of decades past? I feel the answer is Yes. Did it still sound like the band that recorded those earlier albums? I would say Yes to that, too, the essential elements, quantifiable and unquantifiable that make something Yes were there.
There are plenty of good songs to found in that decade's output.
I would even say my two favorite 90s albums are better than my two least favorite 70s albums.
This is my ranking of the 90s albums:
1. Union
2. Talk
3. The Ladder
4. Open Your Eyes
5. Keys to Ascension
Over time, the main change I notice is that The Ladder climbed one spot in my evaluation. In the first few years I had it, it seemed a little cheesy, but eventually more and more songs jumped out to me as being of high quality and I began to rethink that, climbing to the percise middle of the Yes 90s pack.
While Open Your Eyes might not make a top five or top 10 list of my favorite Billy Sherwood albums (i.e. A lot of his non-Yes work is better), I still think it was a pretty creative attempt to reimagine Yes for a new era and that the level of criticism it gets seems uncalled for.
Where maybe my views differ the most from others is that Keys to Ascension might be my least favorite of Yes' 21 albums. Still, "Children of Light" is pretty catchy when it comes up on shuffle. Even the worst Yes album still manages to have some highlights, at least when one isn't listening to them very often.
Comment