Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Yes band members according to ChatGPT

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Yes band members according to ChatGPT

    AI will never be able to beat the knowledge of true Yes afficiandos : below is what ChatGPT produced on the history of Yes band members :

    Yes is a British progressive rock band that was formed in London in 1968. Over the years, the band has undergone numerous lineup changes, with various members joining and leaving the group at different points in its history.

    The original lineup of Yes consisted of vocalist Jon Anderson, bassist Chris Squire, guitarist Peter Banks, keyboardist Tony Kaye, and drummer Bill Bruford. This lineup recorded the band's first two albums, "Yes" (1969) and "Time and a Word" (1970), before Banks was replaced by guitarist Steve Howe in 1970.

    This new lineup of Anderson, Squire, Howe, Kaye, and Bruford went on to record the classic Yes albums "The Yes Album" (1971), "Fragile" (1971), and "Close to the Edge" (1972). However, Kaye left the band after "Close to the Edge" and was replaced by keyboardist Rick Wakeman, who played on the albums "Tales from Topographic Oceans" (1973), "Relayer" (1974), and "Going for the One" (1977).

    After "Going for the One," Anderson and Wakeman left the band, and were replaced by vocalist Trevor Horn and keyboardist Geoff Downes, who played on the album "Drama" (1980). However, this lineup did not last long, and the band went through several more lineup changes over the next decade, with various members coming and going.

    In 1983, Anderson, Squire, and White reunited with guitarist Trevor Rabin and keyboardist Tony Kaye (who had returned to the band) to record the album "90125," which became a huge commercial success and featured the hit singles "Owner of a Lonely Heart" and "Leave It." This lineup of the band continued to record and tour together throughout the 1980s and early 1990s, releasing albums such as "Big Generator" (1987) and "Union" (1991).

    In the mid-1990s, Anderson left the band again, and was replaced by vocalist Jon Davison for the albums "Fly from Here" (2011) and "Heaven & Earth" (2014). Meanwhile, Squire continued to play with the band until his death in 2015. Today, Yes is still active and continues to perform and record new music with a lineup that includes Steve Howe, Alan White, Geoff Downes, Billy Sherwood, and Jon Davison.



    #2
    hmm it got a lot of things partially right, not bad!
    The Definitive YES Albums

    -The Yes Album-Fragile-Close to the Edge-Tales From Topographic Oceans-
    -Relayer-Going for the One-Drama-90125-Big Generator-Talk-
    -The Ladder-Magnification-Fly From Here-The Quest-Mirror to the Sky-

    Comment


      #3
      ^ Applying the 80/20 rule - I would agree

      Comment


        #4
        From now on Yes will be known as The Replacements.

        Comment


          #5
          As to AI, I'd say this was a Turing fail!

          Comment


            #6
            They almost completely mix up the keyboard situation, are off by an album when it comes to when Jon Anderson and Rick Wakeman walked off (Though I suppose a lot of flesh and blood intelligences also want to forget Tormato. ) and when Trevor Horn and Geoff Downes walked on, and have Anderson leaving for the second time in the mid-90s, when he actually left in the mid to late 00s. They also have Jon Davison singing on Fly From Here, completely omitting Benoit David, who actually sang on that album. Alan White only seems to enter the picture in 1983 (Actually in 1972), and it's strongly implied that Trevor Rabin had had a previous stint with the band (Though he didn't) by saying he "rejoined' Yes in 1983.

            I would say ChatGPT still needs more work. I'm surprised it couldn't simplify the band's Wikipedia entry accurately enough to get this right. I mean, it's not like this is arcane knowledge that it has to piece together from various sources and synthesize.a

            Microsoft has been trying to do this since at least Clippy and Microsoft Bob, more recently introducing Cortana, and then phasing it out a bit as the years went on and it wasn't winning the hearts of it's users. So, far, early efforts by other companies, producing things like Siri, Alexa, Bixby and a sort of stealth unnamed Google Assistant for Android phones that existed for a while have at best found niche uses and really haven't lived up to what people hoped they would become (Some have just been outright discontinued).

            It seems inevitable, barring the fall of civilization, that one of these things will eventually work out. Maybe it will be ChatGPT, but if it is, it won't be now. It seems like at minimum it's going to require some software updates and maybe more time to learn via interacting with the general public on the web.

            I don't mind these companies trying, but I've yet to find any of this stuff useful. I sometimes check in and ask it all the standard questions that I expect "easter egg" type responses to based on popular culture (i.e. "What's your favorite song?" Correct answer: Daisy. "If my name were Dave and I asked you to do something, would be willing to do it?" Correct answer "I'm afraid I can't do that, Dave.", "What's the meaning to life, the universe, and everything?" Correct answer: 42). Once I get bored with that kind of stuff, I inevitably disable it.

            When and if they get to the point where I feel like I am interacting with a real digital assistant, something that pass my own personal instinctive turing test of being able to hold real conversations, express real preferences, and remember me and what we talked about the next time we chat, I'd rather just disable the things. Once, and if, they get to the point where they feel more like, I don't know Command Data from Star Trek: The Next Generation, I would definitely leave them enabled.

            I hope when they really get this right some day down the line, they'll give us options like letting us enable using the Clippy animation and name with a voice that fits, or using the voice of Majel Barrett (Who voiced the Enterprise computer in the original Star Trek and most of the computer parts in Star Trek: The Next Generation, Star Trek: Deep Space Nine, and Star Trek: Voyager. She reportedly had herself recorded making all the basic sounds in the English language so that future generations of Trek could use her voice for new responses if they wanted to. That could also in theory be used for psuedo-AI on phones and computers, or for GPS. For whatever reason, they went with a soundalike instead for the Enterprise computer on the Strange New Worlds TV series, but apparently these recordings are out there.), Brent Spiner (Data), etc..
            "A lot of the heavier conversations I was having with Chris toward the end were about his desire for this thing to go forward. He kept reiterating that to me. [...] He kept telling me, 'No matter what happens, Yes needs to continue moving forward and make great music. So promise me that that's something you want to do.'. And I have to keep making music. It's just what I do. [...] I'm a fan of the band and I want to see it thrive and that means new music." -Billy Sherwood

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by downbyariver View Post
              They almost completely mix up the keyboard situation, are off by an album when it comes to when Jon Anderson and Rick Wakeman walked off (Though I suppose a lot of flesh and blood intelligences also want to forget Tormato. ) and when Trevor Horn and Geoff Downes walked on, and have Anderson leaving for the second time in the mid-90s, when he actually left in the mid to late 00s. They also have Jon Davison singing on Fly From Here, completely omitting Benoit David, who actually sang on that album. Alan White only seems to enter the picture in 1983 (Actually in 1972), and it's strongly implied that Trevor Rabin had had a previous stint with the band (Though he didn't) by saying he "rejoined' Yes in 1983.

              I would say ChatGPT still needs more work. I'm surprised it couldn't simplify the band's Wikipedia entry accurately enough to get this right. I mean, it's not like this is arcane knowledge that it has to piece together from various sources and synthesize.a

              Microsoft has been trying to do this since at least Clippy and Microsoft Bob, more recently introducing Cortana, and then phasing it out a bit as the years went on and it wasn't winning the hearts of it's users. So, far, early efforts by other companies, producing things like Siri, Alexa, Bixby and a sort of stealth unnamed Google Assistant for Android phones that existed for a while have at best found niche uses and really haven't lived up to what people hoped they would become (Some have just been outright discontinued).

              It seems inevitable, barring the fall of civilization, that one of these things will eventually work out. Maybe it will be ChatGPT, but if it is, it won't be now. It seems like at minimum it's going to require some software updates and maybe more time to learn via interacting with the general public on the web.

              I don't mind these companies trying, but I've yet to find any of this stuff useful. I sometimes check in and ask it all the standard questions that I expect "easter egg" type responses to based on popular culture (i.e. "What's your favorite song?" Correct answer: Daisy. "If my name were Dave and I asked you to do something, would be willing to do it?" Correct answer "I'm afraid I can't do that, Dave.", "What's the meaning to life, the universe, and everything?" Correct answer: 42). Once I get bored with that kind of stuff, I inevitably disable it.

              When and if they get to the point where I feel like I am interacting with a real digital assistant, something that pass my own personal instinctive turing test of being able to hold real conversations, express real preferences, and remember me and what we talked about the next time we chat, I'd rather just disable the things. Once, and if, they get to the point where they feel more like, I don't know Command Data from Star Trek: The Next Generation, I would definitely leave them enabled.

              I hope when they really get this right some day down the line, they'll give us options like letting us enable using the Clippy animation and name with a voice that fits, or using the voice of Majel Barrett (Who voiced the Enterprise computer in the original Star Trek and most of the computer parts in Star Trek: The Next Generation, Star Trek: Deep Space Nine, and Star Trek: Voyager. She reportedly had herself recorded making all the basic sounds in the English language so that future generations of Trek could use her voice for new responses if they wanted to. That could also in theory be used for psuedo-AI on phones and computers, or for GPS. For whatever reason, they went with a soundalike instead for the Enterprise computer on the Strange New Worlds TV series, but apparently these recordings are out there.), Brent Spiner (Data), etc..
              No more Majel. https://gizmodo.com/star-trek-picard...ett-1850001568
              Not on Yes' payroll.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by soundchaser09 View Post
                hmm it got a lot of things partially right, not bad!
                It got a lot of things partially wrong.

                Imagine it's instructions on how to make an omelette or a peanut butter sandwich or a jet engine. All would be a miserable FAIL if it had this sort of error rate.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by josuev80 View Post
                  This is what I was referring to:

                  As an actress, Majel Barrett‘s most recognizable role didn’t have her actually appear on camera. The wife of Gene Roddenberry, Star Trek’s creator, provided the voice of the ship’s computer on The Next Generation and subsequent films and TV series. And although Barrett passed away in 2008, her voice may live on in…


                  "A lot of the heavier conversations I was having with Chris toward the end were about his desire for this thing to go forward. He kept reiterating that to me. [...] He kept telling me, 'No matter what happens, Yes needs to continue moving forward and make great music. So promise me that that's something you want to do.'. And I have to keep making music. It's just what I do. [...] I'm a fan of the band and I want to see it thrive and that means new music." -Billy Sherwood

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X