Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Symphonic Music of Yes

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Symphonic Music of Yes

    Frankly, I'm a tad surprised that this album is actually considered part of their canon. It's basically a Steve Howe solo album, with a backing orchestra (or chamber orchestra), with Bill Bruford as a session guy, and a guest spot from Jon Anderson.

    Even more embarrassing was Steve and Bill's guest appearance on The Regis and Kathy Lee Morning Show promoting the album as though they were Yes. They played a barely passable 3-man-band rendition of Roundabout, with Howe attempting to sing lead, although he seemed to frequently default to singing a backing vocal line instead. You've heard it, right? They didn't introduce the bass player (who did try to contribute some harmony vocals), but I'll assume it was Tim Harries, who played on the album, and was part of Bill Bruford's Earthworks at the time I think. I'm not surprised that Palmer wasn't on board to participate in this little promo appearance. But this little performance has very little to do with the actual album being promoted.



    I bought the album when it was released, and felt as though I'd been scammed. No, this was a glorified Steve Howe vanity album project.

    Now, I don't blame Howe for the concept, but this was his baby, and he tanked it. Ash said,,"It's far from perfect". Yes, quite far.

    I much prefer the edgier arrangements on both T&aW and Magnification. Better production on those two as well. Symphonic Music Of . . . seemed rather . . . distant (like it was recorded from the room next door) . . . pretentious . . . money grab . . . an attempt to give the songs "Classical Music" cred, at which it failed.

    My guess is that given the failure of Symphonic Music Of, they likely did NOT consider Dee Palmer on purpose when it came to the Magnification album. In fact, these arrangements distinctly do NOT sound like what I would have expected from Palmer, given the excellent work he did for 12 years (and fifteen albums) with Jethro Tull. My take is that as Howe was the primary force behind this album project, Palmer's arrangements were created under specific directions from Howe as to arrange in such a way that the orchestrations did not pull focus from the very great Steve Howe himself.

    Even more surprising is that the "orchestra mixing and engineering" was credited to the also very famous Alan Parsons. To my ears this is the weakest link of the entire album.

    Here's a review of the album on ALLMUSIC by Paul Collins:
    With Alan Parsons in the booth and the London Philharmonic Orchestra backing your band, what could go wrong? A lot, as it turns out. This album was roundly panned upon its release, and time has not proven the critics wrong. The band and the orchestral arrangements take no chances, and that's precisely the problem: if you lived in a Roger Dean landscape, this would be the music playing in the elevators. There are a few bright spots in the passable renditions of "Mood for a Day" and "Heart of the Sunrise," and an interesting reworking of "Soon." But the rest of the album really is just appalling. It's too bad that these twee renditions of the hits has probably put Yes off such projects; if they'd only had the guts to take on a dissonant interpretation of something like "Tales From Topographic Oceans," they may have had something to show for it.

    This ALLMUSIC review, to me, seems pretty "spot on". The album is unadventurous, muted, and sleepy. Face it, even 101 Strings albums have more 'edge'.

    BUT YOU know, I don't actually HATE Symphonic Music of Yes. It's 'nice'. But it's more of a 'Symphonic Tribute' than an actual Yes album though. Great as background music. And it's almost always nice to hear covers of my favorite songs.



    #2
    It works for me as a passive listening experience. Not so much as “Yes” album though. A pleasant curiosity, nothing more.

    I actually really like Mood for a Day. I think that track was pretty clever, really.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by Chrisklenox View Post
      It works for me as a passive listening experience. Not so much as “Yes” album though. A pleasant curiosity, nothing more.

      I actually really like Mood for a Day. I think that track was pretty clever, really.
      Yes, Mood For a Day was a bright spot on the album.

      The tracks with the English Chamber Orchestra seemed to have more *sparkle* than those with the London Philharmonic, which sounded somewhat 'muddy'.



      Comment


        #4
        Really enjoyed this album when it came out. Probably for the novelty. I have listened to it recently, and it can be painfully sterile sounding. I too think Mood for a Day was well done here. And I like Survival, has a fun new age feel to it. I wish a proper symphonic treatment of Yes music could happen, something like what was done with some of Pink Floyd. This doesnt sound too much like a Steve Howe album and nothing like Double Rondo from The Steve Howe album, which I really love. I alway lament Steve not using the orchestra to back up his Vivaldi piece live on Symphonic Yes live. Would have been even better than it was. Though I get that particular interpretation that he does probably doesnt lend itself to that type of accompaniment.

        Comment


          #5
          Never saw the point of this album, not back when it was released, not now.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Mr. Holland View Post
            Never saw the point of this album, not back when it was released, not now.
            I see the point: It could have been epic.

            But it wasn't, and it should have been: There was Steve, Brufy, Dee Palmer, Alan Parsons. Even a cameo by Anderson.

            I mean, it's worked with the music of other Classic bands . . . Jethro Tull (which, coincidentally, ALSO involved Dee Palmer)



            Emerson, Lake & Palmer



            Pink Floyd



            Even Led Zeppelin








            Comment


              #7
              It’s kind of funny to me that Yes’ music is so inherently suited to this treatment, yet this album did not work. I picked up the Floyd symphonic thing, with a Roger Dean cover of all things, and was shocked by how well it worked. My expectations were very low going in. The difference in quality in those two albums vs. my initial expectations makes me scratch my head and chuckle a bit.

              Great Dean cover on the Floyd one btw.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by pianozach View Post

                I see the point: It could have been epic.

                But it wasn't, and it should have been: There was Steve, Brufy, Dee Palmer, Alan Parsons. Even a cameo by Anderson.

                I mean, it's worked with the music of other Classic bands . . . Jethro Tull (which, coincidentally, ALSO involved Dee Palmer)



                Emerson, Lake & Palmer



                Pink Floyd



                Even Led Zeppelin







                I don't know. I don't think I have ever heard albums in this vein, that made me go "Yeah, today I will listen to this instead of the original", even though I recognise that some of these are quite well arranged and executed. That is more what I ment by not seeing the point.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by pianozach View Post

                  [FONT=Arial]I see the point: It could have been epic.

                  But it wasn't, and it should have been: There was Steve, Brufy, Dee Palmer, Alan Parsons. Even a cameo by Anderson.

                  I mean, it's worked with the music of other Classic bands . . .
                  Emerson, Lake & Palmer
                  I hate this version of Tarkus. The arranger guy cut the transition from Eruption to Stones of Years, which was the first thing that caught my ears when I was listening to it at 11-12. This is the kind of dissonant harmonies I learned to love. And they simply discard it. Gross.

                  Symphony
                  Karmachromatic
                  It's only static
                  The key defines the scale we climb
                  To at last perceive we are
                  We are contrast in harmony​

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X