Though the live versions of songs on 1973's Yessongs don't seem dramatically different from the versions on the studio albums that the songs came from, they also weren't slavish note for note recreations.
What are some of your favorite differences between the studio version(s) and the Yessongs version of a song (or songs), and what makes those differences so interesting to you? What differences did you dislike and feel like they should have "stuck to script" more on?
Are there any parts that strike you as obvious concessions to the technology they had available in a life setting being less developed or different than the technology used on the studio albums? If so, how would you say they worked out? Worse? The same but different? Better?
Tony Kaye isn't on the album at all, and Bill Bruford is only on there songs. So, the bulk of the songs feature 3/5th of the original lineup- with White's contributions all coming on sounds he wasn't the original drummer for, and Wakeman's contributions covering songs from one album he wasn't on originally. How did that effect it for you folks?
Finally, looking back, do you feel this live album has an objective importance based on it's music that is still as large as it's sort of retro appeal is? Originally, it was for many years the only Yes live album and basically plays like a live greatest hits album, an added bonus in an era before MP3 playlists or even cassette mix tapes.
Today, it is one of zillions of Yes live albums, many of which cover the same songs, sometimes with better more modern production and other technology and/or with various different lineups of the band, or the exact the same lineup of the band. Plus, you can basically create your own best of- life or studio- album as a playlist anytime.
So, does it have the same appeal as it used to? Or is it just another Yes live album aside from its historical role and the found memories and nostalgia people associate with it?
What are some of your favorite differences between the studio version(s) and the Yessongs version of a song (or songs), and what makes those differences so interesting to you? What differences did you dislike and feel like they should have "stuck to script" more on?
Are there any parts that strike you as obvious concessions to the technology they had available in a life setting being less developed or different than the technology used on the studio albums? If so, how would you say they worked out? Worse? The same but different? Better?
Tony Kaye isn't on the album at all, and Bill Bruford is only on there songs. So, the bulk of the songs feature 3/5th of the original lineup- with White's contributions all coming on sounds he wasn't the original drummer for, and Wakeman's contributions covering songs from one album he wasn't on originally. How did that effect it for you folks?
Finally, looking back, do you feel this live album has an objective importance based on it's music that is still as large as it's sort of retro appeal is? Originally, it was for many years the only Yes live album and basically plays like a live greatest hits album, an added bonus in an era before MP3 playlists or even cassette mix tapes.
Today, it is one of zillions of Yes live albums, many of which cover the same songs, sometimes with better more modern production and other technology and/or with various different lineups of the band, or the exact the same lineup of the band. Plus, you can basically create your own best of- life or studio- album as a playlist anytime.
So, does it have the same appeal as it used to? Or is it just another Yes live album aside from its historical role and the found memories and nostalgia people associate with it?
Comment